Jacobi Journal of Insurance Investigation

Unveiling the truth behind insurance claims.
Protecting integrity in every investigation.

California Approves State Farm’s 22% Rate Hike: California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has provisionally approved State Farm’s request for a 22% homeowners insurance rate increase. However, the approval remains conditional, as the company must justify the hike with supporting data during a public hearing scheduled for April 8.

State Farm’s Response to the Provisional Approval

In a statement, State Farm acknowledged the decision but emphasized the need for long-term stability in the California insurance market. “While the provisional nature of today’s decision does not provide full certainty, it is a step in the right direction,” the company stated. State Farm also confirmed that it would implement the provisionally approved rate while continuing discussions with the California Department of Insurance (CDI) to establish a sustainable path forward.

The insurer reiterated its commitment to transparency, stating, “State Farm General has worked openly and honestly with all parties involved. We will continue monitoring capacity to support risks and build sufficient capital for the future.”

Commissioner Lara’s Conditions for Approval

California Approves State Farm’s 22% Rate Hike: Lara has also urged State Farm to halt non-renewals and seek a $500 million capital infusion from its parent company to restore financial stability. During a recent meeting with State Farm representatives, CDI officials, and an intervenor, Lara presented this proposal as a key component of the state’s insurance strategy.

If upheld, the rate hikes would take effect on June 1, with increases including:

  • 22% for homeowners
  • 15% for renters
  • 15% for condominium owners
  • 38% for rental dwelling policies

State Farm stopped writing new policies in California in May 2023 and has already non-renewed thousands of existing policies.

The Financial Justification for Rate Hikes

Earlier this year, Lara had postponed approving the rate hike, instead calling a meeting with the company to obtain more details about its financial situation. At the time, State Farm cited significant underwriting losses as the primary reason for the requested increase. The company reported that for every $1 collected in premium, it has spent $1.26, leading to cumulative underwriting losses of over $5 billion in the past nine years.

State Farm also highlighted the impact of the devastating Los Angeles wildfires. As of February 14, the company reported 11,400 home and auto claims related to the fires, with payouts exceeding $1.35 billion. Insurers across California have already paid more than $12 billion for losses from the state’s two largest January wildfires, which destroyed tens of thousands of homes.

“To resolve this matter, I am ordering State Farm to respond to questions in an official hearing, promoting transparency and a path forward,” Lara stated. “It is evident that other California insurers cannot absorb State Farm’s existing customers, which increases the risk of policyholders being forced onto the FAIR Plan, something we all want to avoid as we implement my Sustainable Insurance Strategy.”

Consumer Watchdog’s Opposition to the Rate Increase

Consumer Watchdog, a consumer advocacy group, has opposed the emergency rate hike request since its submission. The group welcomed the public hearing, emphasizing that State Farm must provide clear evidence to justify the increase.

“The commissioner called a hearing, just as Consumer Watchdog has been urging since State Farm made its unprecedented $900 million ‘emergency’ rate hike request,” the organization stated. “It’s a victory for consumers that State Farm must make its case before a judge. So far, the company has failed to back up its request, and unless they provide compelling proof, the outcome should be a rejection.”

The Future of California’s Insurance Market

As the state’s largest homeowners insurer, State Farm’s future actions will have broad implications for policyholders. If the rate increase stands, the company may continue operating in California. However, if denied, more non-renewals could follow, adding to the state’s ongoing insurance crisis.

For in-depth analysis of California’s evolving insurance market, visit JacobiJournal.com.

📢 Stay informed. Sign up for our newsletter at JacobiJournal.com!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *