A California federal court recently granted Costco Wholesale Corp. summary judgment, dismissing a claim of wrongful termination and Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) violation filed by an injured worker. The court determined that Costco had met its obligation to accommodate the worker’s disability.
Background of the Case
Margarita Zamora, a long-time Costco employee, filed a lawsuit after a shoulder injury prevented her from lifting, pulling, or pushing more than 10 pounds. This injury made it impossible for her to return to her original job as a stocker.
Zamora suggested she could perform other tasks, like cleaning, if the company modified her role. However, the court ruled that FEHA does not require employers to create light-duty positions for workers unable to do essential job functions. Costco was not obligated to offer her a modified position with non-essential tasks, according to the court.
Court’s Ruling
Violation Claim Against Costco: The court found that Costco made reasonable efforts to accommodate Zamora. Despite trying to find alternative roles for her, the company could not offer a position that met her medical restrictions. In January 2021, Costco terminated her employment.
The court concluded, “Costco reasonably accommodated Zamora by offering vacant positions that aligned with her medical limitations.” The court emphasized that Costco had no duty to create a new position with tasks outside of Zamora’s restrictions.
Legal Precedents and Implications
This case reinforces that employers must engage in good-faith efforts to accommodate employees with disabilities. However, employers are not required to create modified roles or change essential job functions. They must demonstrate reasonable attempts to adjust existing roles to fit the employee’s medical needs.
For more updates on workplace and employment law, visit Jacobi Journal. For further details, read the original article from WorkCompCentral.