- Inconsistent Writing Style: If the report has sections that vary significantly in tone, vocabulary, or structure, it might suggest multiple authors.
- Generic or Vague Language: Ghostwritten reports may lack specific details about the case or use overly broad statements that don’t address the injured worker’s unique situation.
- Missing Key Elements: A proper QME report should include a detailed history of the injury, a thorough record review, and clear reasoning for conclusions. If these are absent or poorly done, it could be a red flag.
- Errors or Omissions: Ghostwriters might miss important records or fail to discuss significant evidence, leading to inaccuracies.
- Unusual Formatting or Structure: If the report deviates from standard templates or guidelines, it might indicate external involvement.
If you’re reviewing a QME report and suspect it might be ghostwritten, you could compare it to other reports by the same evaluator or consult with a legal expert for further analysis.