May 13, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com — Attorney Liens Scrutinized: In a decisive regulatory move, the California Division of Workers’ Compensation (DWC) has intensified oversight of attorney liens by swiftly suspending those filed by attorney Antony Gluck, who is now at the center of a major workers’ compensation fraud investigation. The DWC’s action—announced in response to Gluck’s recent indictment—reflects an evolving legal landscape where attorney liens are increasingly scrutinized for potential abuse, especially in fraud-related cases.
Regulators allege that Gluck’s firm used unethical and illegal tactics to amass client liens, prompting officials to issue an immediate stay under Labor Code § 4615. While proponents of the suspension argue it protects public trust and injured workers, critics voice concern over the potential erosion of due process. This high-profile case has not only placed attorney liens under scrutiny but has also reignited debate about how swiftly the DWC should act before a conviction is secured.
As the case unfolds, legal observers expect greater enforcement and compliance pressure within the workers’ compensation system—especially concerning lien practices linked to suspected fraudulent schemes. The DWC’s bold stance indicates that attorney liens scrutinized in fraud probes may face rapid regulatory responses even ahead of final court rulings.
Gluck Faces Major Charges in Alleged Fraud Operation
Antony Gluck, 55, now faces felony charges for conspiracy and illegal client referrals. Investigators say that from September 2021 to October 2024, he paid $388,500 to acquire 798 clients—many of whom were Spanish-speaking workers misled by a Mexico-based call center. These individuals were promised financial benefits through workers’ compensation claims. However, their information was secretly sold to attorneys like Gluck.
The California Department of Insurance began investigating the scheme in 2022. Ultimately, the probe uncovered the illegal sale of over 1,100 clients for more than $550,000, implicating several individuals in a widespread operation.
DWC Moves Quickly to Suspend Gluck’s Liens
On April 25, 2025, the DWC publicly listed Gluck under the category of “Criminally Charged Providers Whose Liens are Stayed” pursuant to Labor Code § 4615. This move halted at least ten liens associated with his law offices across Los Angeles, Woodland Hills, and San Bernardino. These include:
- 3905641 – 2500 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles
- 3905643 – 20750 Ventura Blvd, Woodland Hills
- 3826564 – 2500 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles
- 10225601 – 225 W Hospitality Ln STE 204, San Bernardino
- 10437838 – Same address
- 10221030 – Same address
- 10420720 – Same address
- 10424142 – Same address
- 10791163 – Same address
- 9892616 – Same address
Although Labor Code § 4615 allows DWC to stay liens filed by providers facing criminal charges, the speed of Gluck’s suspension has caught many in the legal community off guard.
Legal Community Questions Timing and Fairness
Attorney Liens Scrutinized: While many support strong measures against fraud, some legal professionals question whether this response came too early. “Due process matters,” one Southern California attorney stated. “This kind of financial penalty—if premature—can devastate a law practice long before guilt is established.”
The issue has reignited debate over how the DWC enforces lien suspensions. Although the law allows action before a conviction, critics argue that such measures must be balanced with the presumption of innocence.
Additional Defendants Linked to the Alleged Scheme
The case, officially titled People v. Antony Eli Gluck, et al. (Case No. FSB25001283), also names three co-defendants:
- Michael De La Garza, 41, an attorney from Fontana
- Arely Franco, 42, from San Diego
- Juan Leal, 57, from Riverside
According to investigators, Franco served as the central broker, selling 320 clients to De La Garza and Leal for $168,750, and the remaining 798 to Gluck. These individuals reportedly used false promises and deceptive tactics to exploit vulnerable workers—many unaware their personal information had been sold.
What’s at Stake for the Workers’ Comp System
This high-profile case underscores the fragility of trust in California’s workers’ compensation system. It also exposes how fraud schemes can exploit already marginalized groups. The DWC’s quick lien suspension has raised tough questions: Should regulatory bodies act immediately in the interest of public trust, or wait for formal convictions to uphold due process?
As the San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office continues its prosecution, the legal community will closely watch how courts balance the fight against fraud with the rights of the accused.
The DWC’s rapid lien suspension of Gluck sets a bold tone for fraud prevention. However, it also risks undermining legal fairness if not carefully justified.
FAQs: Attorney Liens Scrutinized
Why Were Attorney Liens Scrutinized by the DWC?
The California DWC scrutinized attorney liens linked to Antony Gluck after he was indicted in a workers’ compensation fraud case. The agency quickly suspended over ten liens under Labor Code § 4615. This raised concerns about whether such suspensions, without a conviction, are fair or premature.
What Are the Implications of Attorney Liens Being Scrutinized Pre-Trial?
When attorney liens are scrutinized before a trial concludes, it places financial and reputational strain on legal professionals. In this case, Gluck’s practice saw immediate suspension of liens even before a court ruling—sparking debate about balancing fraud prevention with due process.
How Does the Scrutiny of Attorney Liens Affect Injured Workers?
Attorney liens scrutinized by the DWC can delay or complicate case resolutions for injured workers. If an attorney is removed from a case mid-process due to fraud allegations, clients may face legal limbo, particularly when they were unaware of the alleged misconduct.
Stay ahead of California’s workers’ compensation fraud cases, enforcement updates, and regulatory shifts. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for expert legal reporting and in-depth coverage on lien suspensions and due process debates.