DOJ Seeks $11M in Civil Forfeiture Over Miami DME Fraud Case
August 22, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com — Federal prosecutors are moving to seize nearly $11 million in assets tied to an alleged Miami DME fraud scheme that billed Medicare for over $33 million in medically unnecessary equipment. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) says the case highlights a growing enforcement focus on healthcare fraud in the durable medical equipment sector. Miami DME Fraud Involving Unnecessary Billing The DOJ’s civil forfeiture complaint alleges that two Miami-based suppliers submitted false claims for orthotic braces and other devices that patients did not need or never received. Prosecutors say these actions violated federal healthcare fraud statutes and exploited taxpayer-funded programs. DOJ Traces Fraud Proceeds to $11 Million in Assets Investigators allege the targeted funds in this Miami DME fraud case were routed through multiple accounts and shell companies to obscure their origin. The DOJ is seeking to seize the money as proceeds of the fraudulent billing scheme. Federal Crackdown on Miami DME Fraud Schemes The DOJ has intensified enforcement actions against Miami DME fraud operations, citing the sector’s high risk for abuse. Officials say these cases protect Medicare’s financial integrity and deter future fraudulent billing practices. Source: U.S. Department of Justice. FAQs: About Miami DME Fraud What is Miami DME fraud? It refers to schemes in Miami involving durable medical equipment suppliers who bill Medicare for unnecessary or unprovided devices. How does civil forfeiture apply to Miami DME fraud cases? Civil forfeiture allows the government to seize assets tied to the fraud, even without a criminal conviction, if it can prove the connection in court. Why is Miami a focus for DME fraud enforcement? Miami is a high-priority area for fraud investigations due to the concentration of DME suppliers and history of large-scale Medicare fraud cases. Stay informed on major healthcare fraud cases and legal developments. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for exclusive updates, expert insights, and in-depth analysis. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
Veterans’ Grant Fraud: VA Nonprofit Leader Charged
July 28, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Federal authorities charged a former leader of a veterans’ service organization with veterans grant fraud, accusing him of misappropriating approximately $1.8 million in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Department of Labor (DOL) grants. The nonprofit, operated under the name “The Warrior’s Refuge,” provided social services and housing support to veterans. Charges and Allegations in the Veterans Grant Fraud Case The Justice Department alleges that the executive diverted funds meant for veteran counseling and shelter into personal expenses. Records indicate the individual altered multiple grant applications submitted between February and April 2020 to overstate operating costs and conceal misuse. The scheme is now among the most notable veteran grant fraud cases under federal prosecution in 2025. Scope of the Fraud Scheme Authorities estimate the fraud involved $1.3 million in VA grant money and $500,000 in DOL funding. Prosecutors assert the money went toward luxury goods, entertainment, and personal lifestyles rather than the nonprofit’s stated mission of supporting homeless veterans. Further investigation revealed that the alleged veterans grant fraud extended across multiple fiscal years, with expenditures including high-end electronics, international travel, and unapproved consulting fees disguised as operational costs. Financial audits uncovered a lack of board oversight and forged documentation submitted during grant renewal periods—raising red flags with federal compliance monitors. According to internal sources familiar with the probe, some grant disbursements were rerouted through third-party shell accounts, complicating recovery efforts and prompting a deeper review into similar veterans grant fraud risks within smaller nonprofits. The DOJ noted that this case reflects ongoing vulnerabilities in federal veteran assistance funding streams and may trigger new oversight reforms in future grant cycles. Legal and Compliance Implications This case underscores vulnerabilities in federal oversight and marks a significant example of veterans’ grant fraud. Compliance experts urge nonprofits to adopt strong financial controls, regular audits, and clear documentation. The misuse of VA and DOL funds has sparked renewed focus on grant monitoring and accountability, with the OIG expected to release updated guidance for veterans’ service providers later this year. Legal analysts suggest this case may influence harsher penalties for future veterans’ grant fraud involving vulnerable populations. Grantees are advised to implement whistleblower policies, independent financial reviews, and internal safeguards to prevent misuse. What’s at Stake If convicted, the defendant could face up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. This prosecution demonstrates the government’s commitment to safeguarding taxpayer-funded programs that serve vulnerable populations, particularly veterans. For more information on reporting suspected nonprofit grant abuse, visit the HHS Office of Inspector General’s reporting portal. FAQ: Veterans’ Grant Fraud What constitutes veterans’ grant fraud? Veterans’ grant fraud involves misusing public funds awarded to nonprofit or service organizations intended for veteran benefit programs, such as housing, counseling, and job support. How can nonprofits prevent veterans’ grant fraud? Nonprofits should adopt transparent bookkeeping, conduct independent financial audits, train staff on grant compliance, and establish oversight boards to monitor spending. What are common red flags of veterans’ grant fraud? Common red flags of veterans’ grant fraud include inflated budgets, lack of financial transparency, irregular reporting, personal use of funds, and repeated amendments to grant applications without clear justification. Watchdog agencies often investigate when these signs appear. Where can I report suspected veterans’ grant fraud? You can report suspected misuse of veteran-related grants to the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG) via their portal. Stay informed on enforcement developments and compliance news in veteran services and public funding. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for weekly analysis on grant fraud, regulatory updates, and prosecutorial actions. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
National Health Care Fraud Takedown: California Defendants Charged in $14.6B Scam
July 4, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Federal authorities have charged 324 defendants in the 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown, exposing schemes worth over $14.6 billion. Among them, California healthcare fraud cases stood out, particularly in telemedicine, durable medical equipment (DME), lab testing, and opioid-related crimes. The Department of Justice confirmed that in the Northern District of California, five defendants face indictments for orchestrating Medicare fraud and illegal drug diversion schemes. These charges reflect California’s significant role in nationwide healthcare fraud trends, as the state remains a key focus for federal investigators due to its large healthcare market and history of complex fraud cases. According to the Office of Inspector General (OIG), these California-based schemes exploited vulnerable patient populations, fabricated billing for unnecessary or non-existent services, and contributed to the growing opioid crisis through illegal prescriptions. Authorities noted that advanced data analytics and inter-agency collaboration were pivotal in identifying these fraudulent networks. Federal prosecutors have emphasized that California healthcare fraud is not only a legal issue but a public health concern, draining critical resources from Medicare and Medicaid programs. As enforcement continues, healthcare providers and entities in the state are urged to strengthen compliance measures to avoid legal repercussions and safeguard public trust. Northern California’s Key Medicare Fraud Cases One notable defendant, Vincent Thayer of San Jose, is accused of submitting $68 million in fraudulent COVID-19 testing claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and the HRSA COVID-19 Uninsured Program. Authorities allege that Thayer exploited pandemic-era funding mechanisms, filing claims for tests that were either never performed or were medically unnecessary. This significant case underscores how California healthcare fraud schemes adapted quickly to capitalize on emergency federal funding intended for public health support during the pandemic. Another case involves Sevendik Huseynov of Sunnyvale, who is charged with using stolen identities to fraudulently bill Medicare Advantage for unnecessary durable medical equipment (DME). By manipulating patient information and fabricating needs for equipment like braces and orthotics, Huseynov allegedly siphoned millions from federal healthcare programs. These California healthcare fraud cases reveal how deeply fraudsters have infiltrated not only pandemic relief programs but also routine healthcare billing systems. The scale of deception reflects broader vulnerabilities in healthcare oversight, where swift adaptations by criminal networks can outpace regulatory safeguards. Federal officials stress that these prosecutions are part of an intensified crackdown aimed at deterring similar frauds and protecting the integrity of healthcare funding in California and nationwide. The Department of Justice, alongside the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, continues to pursue those who exploit public health crises for personal gain. DOJ’s Data-Driven Fight Against California Healthcare Fraud Following this sweep, the DOJ’s Health Care Fraud Data Fusion Center is set to intensify efforts using AI and advanced data analytics to identify fraud patterns, particularly within California’s complex healthcare landscape. The state’s diverse and extensive healthcare infrastructure—spanning large hospital systems, telemedicine providers, and specialized care facilities—creates multiple entry points for bad actors. By leveraging predictive analytics, the DOJ aims to detect emerging California healthcare fraud trends before they escalate into billion-dollar losses. These technologies enable authorities to cross-reference billing anomalies, patient data, and provider networks in real-time, exposing schemes that would traditionally remain hidden for years. Officials emphasize that California’s high volume of healthcare transactions, combined with its leadership in digital health innovation, makes it both a target and a testbed for fraud detection initiatives. The ongoing collaboration between the DOJ, HHS Office of Inspector General, and California state agencies ensures that data-driven enforcement is tailored to the unique challenges posed by the state’s healthcare sector. Read the DOJ’s official press release on the takedown here. FAQs: About California Healthcare Fraud Takedown What is the National Health Care Fraud Takedown? The National Health Care Fraud Takedown is a coordinated federal effort by the DOJ and HHS to target large-scale healthcare fraud across the U.S., including cases of Medicare fraud, telemedicine scams, and drug diversion. How is California involved in healthcare fraud cases? California healthcare fraud cases often involve telemedicine billing schemes, DME fraud, and illegal drug diversion, with defendants exploiting federal healthcare programs like Medicare and Medicaid. What penalties do defendants face in California healthcare fraud cases? Defendants charged in California healthcare fraud cases face severe penalties, including significant prison time, hefty fines, and asset forfeiture if convicted of fraud, conspiracy, and related offenses. Stay Informed on Healthcare Fraud Enforcement. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for real-time updates on fraud investigations and healthcare compliance enforcement. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
DOJ Indicts Hospice Owners in Fort Bend for Massive $87M Healthcare Fraud
June 25, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Fort Bend hospice healthcare fraud remains a growing concern as federal programs face ongoing exploitation. Healthcare fraud continues to plague these systems, with the Department of Justice indicting two hospice owners in Fort Bend County for their alleged role in a $87 million Medicare and Medicaid scheme. The charges, announced in June, involve fraudulent billing practices and falsified patient records that exploited end-of-life care services for financial gain. Fraudulent Admissions and Falsified Records According to the indictment, the defendants enrolled patients who were not terminally ill into hospice programs, contributing to the broader issue of Fort Bend hospice healthcare fraud. They allegedly forged physician documentation and backdated certifications to make those patients appear eligible for end-of-life care. Furthermore, prosecutors claim the group paid kickbacks to doctors and hospital employees to secure fraudulent referrals, deepening the extent of the healthcare fraud scheme. Oversight Failures and Financial Damage The scheme, which ran from 2019 to 2025, went largely undetected until federal audits in 2022 raised concerns about the ongoing Fort Bend hospice healthcare fraud. Despite these early warnings, the fraudulent billing reportedly continued, highlighting significant gaps in regulatory oversight and enforcement mechanisms. Officials state that over $110 million in claims were submitted, with approximately $87 million reimbursed by Medicare and Medicaid. This lapse in oversight not only enabled the fraud to persist but also exposed weaknesses in the monitoring systems meant to safeguard public healthcare funds. Regulatory agencies have since emphasized the importance of more frequent audits, enhanced data analysis, and cross-agency cooperation to identify and stop such healthcare fraud schemes earlier in the process. Patient Harm and Legal Ramifications Many patients enrolled in hospice were unaware of their change in care status, which could have delayed or denied them appropriate treatment. The legal charges include conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud and wire fraud. If convicted, the defendants face decades in prison and millions in asset forfeitures. A Warning for Medical-Legal Stakeholders This case underscores the urgent need for stronger compliance systems in hospice and palliative care. Legal teams, regulators, and healthcare providers must implement better audit protocols and patient verification processes to prevent similar abuses in the future. As healthcare fraud becomes more complex, enforcement and ethical oversight remain critical pillars of patient safety and public trust. Learn more about healthcare fraud prevention efforts from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services OIG. FAQs About Fort Bend Hospice Healthcare Fraud What is the Fort Bend hospice healthcare fraud case about? The case involves hospice owners in Fort Bend County indicted for fraudulently enrolling non-terminally ill patients into hospice care, forging medical records, and submitting false claims totaling $87 million to Medicare and Medicaid. How does hospice fraud impact patients? Patients may be misclassified as terminally ill without their knowledge, limiting access to curative treatments and appropriate medical care. This can compromise patient safety and care quality. What penalties do the defendants face in the Fort Bend hospice healthcare fraud case? If convicted, the indicted hospice owners could face decades in federal prison, significant fines, and asset forfeiture under healthcare fraud and wire fraud statutes. Stay updated on healthcare fraud enforcement and legal actions. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for weekly insights into fraud investigations, regulatory updates, and policy developments. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
Financial Fraud’s Expanding Reach: One in Five Americans Affected
June 20, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Financial fraud is now a national epidemic, with one in five Americans falling victim to scams ranging from phishing schemes to identity theft. As fraud tactics become more advanced, individuals of all ages and backgrounds face increasing risk. Recent reports reveal that financial fraud isn’t limited to one sector or demographic. Instead, it’s spreading across industries—targeting consumers through email, phone calls, social media, and even fake job listings. This widespread vulnerability underscores a serious need for stronger public awareness and systemic safeguards. How Scams Are Evolving Fraudsters now use more sophisticated techniques to deceive their targets. For instance, some impersonate trusted institutions, such as banks or government agencies. Others manipulate social platforms to push fraudulent investment opportunities or “get-rich-quick” schemes. The rise of AI-generated content and deepfakes adds another layer of complexity, making it harder to tell real from fake. Who’s at Risk While older adults were once prime targets, younger generations are increasingly affected. Millennials and Gen Z, often more active online, are falling victim to digital scams at alarming rates. Additionally, minority communities and low-income groups tend to be disproportionately impacted, often due to limited access to fraud education and resources. Why It Matters Now The financial and emotional toll of fraud can be devastating. Victims not only lose money but also face damaged credit, legal issues, and lasting psychological effects. Moreover, widespread fraud erodes public trust in financial systems, making the need for change even more urgent. What Can Be Done To combat this growing threat, experts urge stronger fraud detection tools, educational initiatives, and more aggressive law enforcement action. Staying informed is key—consumers must remain alert, verify sources, and report suspicious activity immediately. For more resources on preventing financial fraud, visit the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) fraud resources. FAQs About Financial Fraud What is financial fraud and how does it impact Americans?Financial fraud refers to deceptive schemes like identity theft, phishing, and investment scams that result in financial loss. In 2025, one in five Americans have reported being targeted or affected by such scams. How can I protect myself from financial fraud?To avoid financial fraud, always verify requests for personal information, use strong passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and monitor bank statements regularly. Reporting suspicious activity to authorities helps curb further exploitation. Are certain age groups more vulnerable to financial fraud?While older adults were previously more targeted, younger people, including Millennials and Gen Z, now face increasing exposure to financial fraud, particularly through social media scams and digital phishing tactics. Stay informed and safeguard your finances. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for weekly insights on fraud trends, prevention tips, and regulatory updates. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
JPMorgan’s $175M Frank Acquisition: A Cautionary Tale in Due Diligence
June 13, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com –JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud became a high-profile case following JPMorgan Chase’s 2021 acquisition of the fintech startup Frank for $175 million. The bank aimed to enhance its services for college students seeking financial aid. However, the deal turned sour when it was revealed that Frank’s founder, Charlie Javice, had significantly inflated the company’s user base. This deception led to one of the most notable due diligence oversights in recent history and ultimately exposed the extent of the JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud that shocked the finance and tech industries alike. The Acquisition and Its Fallout Frank was marketed as a platform simplifying the college financial aid process, boasting over four million users. JPMorgan saw this as an opportunity to tap into a younger demographic, particularly students navigating complex financial aid systems. The acquisition aimed to expand the bank’s digital footprint among Gen Z consumers and strengthen its financial services tailored for education financing. Yet, by December 2022, the bank filed a lawsuit against Javice, alleging that the actual number of users was closer to 300,000—far fewer than claimed. This discrepancy triggered internal reviews and public scrutiny, casting doubt on JPMorgan’s acquisition vetting process and raising questions about the accountability of startup founders in financial disclosures. The revelation prompted renewed industry discussions about the need for stronger verification of user data in merger and acquisition activities, especially in the rapidly evolving fintech space. JPMorgan Frank Acquisition Fraud: How the Scheme Worked Investigations uncovered that Javice had hired a data scientist to fabricate a list of fake users to support her inflated claims. This synthetic data was crafted to withstand basic due diligence checks and was presented during the acquisition process, misleading JPMorgan about Frank’s true reach. Federal prosecutors detailed how the falsified data was carefully structured to mimic genuine user records, making the deception harder to detect during the acquisition review. The scheme not only misled one of the world’s largest financial institutions but also revealed the vulnerabilities in high-stakes corporate transactions when data integrity is compromised. This case serves as a warning for both investors and regulatory bodies on the importance of digital data audits in financial acquisitions. For more on corporate fraud enforcement, visit the U.S. Department of Justice’s official page. Legal Consequences The JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud case reached a critical point in March 2025 when Charlie Javice was convicted on multiple counts, including securities fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy. The conviction underscored the seriousness of her deception in inflating Frank’s user data, which misled JPMorgan during the acquisition. She faces a maximum prison term of 30 years on the most serious count, reflecting the gravity of corporate fraud at this scale. This high-profile conviction in the JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud saga sends a clear message to startup founders and financial institutions alike: misrepresentation and data manipulation in mergers and acquisitions carry severe legal repercussions. It also highlights the need for rigorous due diligence processes to prevent similar incidents in future financial transactions. Lessons Learned This case underscores the importance of thorough due diligence, especially in the fintech sector. Companies must go beyond surface-level evaluations and verify critical data to avoid costly mistakes. Conclusion The Frank acquisition serves as a stark reminder that in the fast-paced world of fintech, due diligence is not just a formality but a necessity. Organizations must implement rigorous verification processes to safeguard against fraud and protect their investments. FAQ: About the JPMorgan Frank Acquisition Fraud What was the main issue in the JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud case?The primary issue in the JPMorgan Frank acquisition fraud case was the deliberate inflation of user data by Frank’s founder, Charlie Javice. She allegedly fabricated a database of fake users to mislead JPMorgan into believing the platform had over four million users, when the actual figure was closer to 300,000. This misrepresentation led to criminal charges including securities fraud, wire fraud, and conspiracy, ultimately resulting in her conviction in 2025. For more information on corporate fraud enforcement, visit the official website here. Stay updated on high-profile corporate fraud cases and enforcement actions. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for expert insights on financial investigations, due diligence risks, and regulatory updates. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
Telemedicine and Fraud: A Double-Edged Sword
June 11, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Telemedicine fraud is rising alongside the boom in virtual healthcare. As telemedicine reshapes healthcare access, it also opens new opportunities for deception. While virtual care brings convenience, bad actors exploit its digital nature to commit large-scale schemes. From fake billing to identity theft, the risks are mounting — and healthcare professionals must stay vigilant. The Rise of Telemedicine Fraud and Virtual Care Challenges Telemedicine surged during the pandemic, making healthcare more accessible for millions. However, this rapid adoption also left gaps that fraudsters eagerly filled, fueling a surge in telemedicine fraud. Scammers have exploited the virtual nature of care, taking advantage of lax verification processes and limited oversight in remote consultations. They used stolen identities, fake provider credentials, and inflated claims to siphon funds from government programs like Medicare and Medicaid. In many cases, telemedicine fraud involves billing for services never provided, fabricating patient encounters, or exaggerating the complexity of care delivered. This fraudulent activity not only drains public resources but also undermines trust in digital health services, creating barriers for legitimate telehealth providers and patients seeking convenient care options. Red Flags in Remote Care Fraudsters have grown more sophisticated. Some create fictitious clinics that never see patients but still bill for services. Others submit claims for expensive tests or procedures that never occurred. Additionally, providers have reported instances where patients were billed for telehealth visits they never scheduled. Enforcement Agencies Step In Thankfully, government watchdogs have significantly increased enforcement efforts to combat telemedicine fraud. Agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Office of Inspector General (OIG), and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) are working together to investigate and prosecute telehealth-related fraud schemes more aggressively. Recent enforcement actions include coordinated nationwide takedowns targeting fraudulent telemedicine providers who exploited Medicare and Medicaid. These operations often uncover complex networks involving fake clinics, unlicensed practitioners, and fraudulent billing practices. Despite these efforts, many telemedicine fraud schemes remain undetected due to the digital and often anonymous nature of virtual healthcare, costing taxpayers billions annually. Regulators are also investing in advanced data analytics and cross-agency collaborations to better identify suspicious patterns in telehealth billing. This enhanced scrutiny aims not only to catch current offenders but also to deter future fraud in the rapidly growing virtual healthcare sector. What Healthcare Organizations Can Do To stay ahead of fraud, healthcare organizations must implement robust compliance programs. Regular audits, identity verification, and secure digital platforms help reduce the risk. Moreover, training staff to recognize unusual billing or patient activity strengthens the first line of defense. A Call for Balanced Innovation Ultimately, telemedicine offers undeniable benefits—but it must evolve with fraud prevention in mind. As the industry grows, so must the systems that protect it. With proper safeguards, healthcare providers can embrace innovation while keeping fraud at bay. Learn more about healthcare fraud prevention from the HHS Office of Inspector General here. FAQ: Understanding Telemedicine Fraud What is telemedicine fraud and how can patients protect themselves?Telemedicine fraud occurs when scammers exploit virtual healthcare services to submit false claims, use stolen identities, or bill for services never provided. Patients can protect themselves by verifying their telehealth provider’s credentials, keeping track of services received, and monitoring their insurance statements for unauthorized charges. Reporting suspicious activity to healthcare authorities can also help prevent further fraud. Stay informed on telemedicine fraud trends and healthcare enforcement updates. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for weekly insights into fraud prevention and regulatory news. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
FTX Investor Lawsuit Narrowed Against Tom Brady, Steph Curry
May 9, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – FTX Investor Lawsuit: A federal judge has narrowed but not dismissed a lawsuit that seeks to hold celebrities like Tom Brady, Stephen Curry, and Shohei Ohtani accountable for promoting the failed cryptocurrency platform FTX. The investors allege that the celebrity endorsers ignored red flags and secretly accepted millions to serve as FTX brand ambassadors. They claim these actions amounted to a civil conspiracy to defraud customers. Most Claims Dismissed, But Key Allegations Survive On May 8, U.S. District Judge K. Michael Moore dismissed 12 of 14 claims, finding the investors failed to show the celebrities knew FTX was a fraudulent operation. He ruled that accepting payment alone does not prove conspiracy. However, the judge let two claims survive. He found it plausible under Florida law that the defendants helped FTX sell unregistered securities. A related Oklahoma claim was also allowed to proceed. These remaining claims rely on strict liability statutes, which do not require proof of intent or knowledge of wrongdoing. Celebrity Endorsers Still Facing Legal Pressure The lawsuit continues against several high-profile figures, including: Plaintiffs say these endorsers misled the public by promoting FTX without disclosing their compensation or performing proper due diligence. Investors Plan to Expand Lawsuit Adam Moskowitz, who represents the investors, called the ruling a win. He announced plans to file an amended complaint that could include Major League Baseball and Formula 1 Racing as new defendants. Some celebrities, including Shaquille O’Neal and Trevor Lawrence, have already settled. Background: FTX’s Fall and Bankman-Fried’s Conviction FTX Investor Lawsuit: FTX filed for bankruptcy in November 2022. In October 2023, a judge approved a plan to repay customers. Founder Sam Bankman-Fried was convicted of fraud and sentenced to 25 years in prison, though he is currently appealing. The case is being heard in the Southern District of Florida under the title:In re FTX Cryptocurrency Exchange Collapse Litigation, No. 23-md-03076. This case shows that celebrities who promote financial products—especially unregistered securities—may face legal consequences, even if they claim ignorance. It also signals stricter accountability in how influencers promote digital assets. Source FAQs: About the FTX Investor Lawsuit What is the FTX investor lawsuit about? The FTX investor lawsuit targets celebrities like Tom Brady and Steph Curry for allegedly promoting FTX without due diligence. Investors claim these endorsements misled the public and contributed to major financial losses. Why are only two claims moving forward in the FTX investor lawsuit? The judge dismissed most claims but allowed two under strict liability for promoting unregistered securities. These don’t require proof the celebrities knew of wrongdoing, keeping the FTX investor lawsuit alive. What are the implications of the FTX investor lawsuit for celebrity endorsements? The FTX investor lawsuit sets a precedent for holding influencers legally accountable when endorsing financial products. It signals growing regulatory attention on crypto and financial promotions. Stay informed on high-impact financial litigation and regulatory crackdowns—subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for exclusive legal insights and compliance updates. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
Fired State Employees Exposed Personal Data of 33K Texans
May 1, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – Fired State Employees Exposed Personal Data of 33K Texans: Late Wednesday, the Texas HHSC data breach was confirmed when the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) notified 33,529 recipients of state benefits that fired state employees had improperly accessed their private information. This latest announcement follows an ongoing investigation into breaches involving state employees who accessed Medicaid, food stamp, and other assistance programs’ data. Three months ago, the agency notified 61,104 Texans about the breach of their personal information by state employees. Seven employees were fired at that time, including two who had stolen from recipients’ food stamp cards. Texas HHSC Data Breach: State Employees Involved in Unauthorized Access In February, HHSC notified lawmakers that two more employees had been fired, raising the total to nine employees who accessed individuals’ accounts without legitimate reasons. These employees are now responsible for breaching the personal data of another 33,529 account holders who applied for or received assistance between June 2021 and January 2025. HHSC has not yet determined how many of those individuals had their benefits compromised. Fired State Employees Exposed Personal Data of 33K Texans Recommendations for Affected Texans HHSC urges affected individuals to carefully review their accounts and examine statements from health care providers, insurance companies, and financial institutions to ensure that their account activity is correct. They should report any questionable charges to the respective provider and notify law enforcement promptly. The agency recommends that Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients check their Lone Star Card transactions for fraudulent activity. Individuals can do this by visiting YourTexasBenefits.com or using the mobile app. If they suspect SNAP fraud, they should call 2-1-1, select a language, and choose option 3 to report the fraud to the Texas Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General. Affected individuals should also contact law enforcement and visit a local HHSC benefits office to replace their stolen benefits. Details of the Breach and Available Resources HHSC reports that the compromised data includes full names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, email addresses, Social Security numbers, Medicaid and Medicare identification numbers, and other personal information. The agency offers two years of free credit monitoring and identity theft protection services to those affected. Individuals can also call 866-362-1773, using engagement number B139792, for further assistance. Contractor Employee Terminated Over Improper Access HHSC has notified one of its contractors, Maximus, about an employee suspected of misusing personal data from HHSC’s systems. Maximus terminated the employee for improperly accessing protected health information of Texans enrolled in state benefits between May 8, 2023, and February 28, 2025. The Texas HHSC Office of the Inspector General is conducting an investigation into these data breaches. For more information, visit the Texas Tribune. FAQs: About the Texas HHSC Data Breach What personal information was exposed in the data breach? The breach involved names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers, Medicaid and Medicare IDs, and other sensitive personal data of over 33,000 Texans. What should Texans do if they were affected by the data breach? Affected individuals should monitor their accounts for suspicious activity, review Lone Star Card transactions, report any fraud to HHSC and law enforcement, and use the free credit monitoring services offered. How is the HHSC responding to the data breach? HHSC is investigating the breach, providing two years of free credit monitoring, working with law enforcement, and has terminated employees and contractors responsible for improper access. Get the latest updates on workers’ compensation fraud and other critical industry news. Stay ahead by reading more insightful articles and case analyses on JacobiJournal.com. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
San Diego Construction Firm Penalized $157K for Deadly Trench Collapse
March 31, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com – The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) fined W.A. Rasic Construction, a San Diego construction firm, $157,500 for multiple violations of safety regulations. This fine follows a fatal trench collapse on August 28, 2024, in which an employee tragically lost their life while working in an unprotected excavation. What Happened: Fatal Trench Collapse in San Diego On August 28, 2024, at around 3:00 a.m., a worker was inside a 17-foot-deep trench at the construction site when the trench suddenly collapsed. The collapse displaced a concrete pipe, pinning the worker and causing fatal injuries. Cal/OSHA’s investigation revealed several serious violations related to excavation and trench safety. Cal/OSHA Findings: Serious Violations at the San Diego Construction Site Several critical safety violations contributed to the fatal incident: Cal/OSHA Chief’s Statement Cal/OSHA Chief Debra Lee emphasized the importance of enforcing safety regulations: “No worker should lose their life due to preventable safety failures. We will continue to enforce trench safety rules and hold employers accountable.” Workers’ Rights and Employer Appeals Employers, including San Diego construction firms, have the right to appeal any Cal/OSHA citation. Appeals must be filed within 15 working days. For further details, visit the Cal/OSHA Appeals Page. Additionally, workers, regardless of immigration status, are protected under Cal/OSHA regulations. They can file confidential complaints with Cal/OSHA’s district offices if they encounter any safety hazards. FAQs: San Diego Construction Firm Penalized Why was the San Diego construction firm penalized by Cal/OSHA? The San Diego construction firm penalized received $157K in fines for failing to provide cave-in protection, conduct inspections, and implement a safety program. What safety violations were linked to the San Diego construction firm penalized by Cal/OSHA? Violations included no Injury and Illness Prevention Program, inadequate trench inspections, and lack of protective systems against cave-ins. Can a construction firm penalized by Cal/OSHA appeal its citation? Yes. Employers have 15 working days to appeal Cal/OSHA citations through the Cal/OSHA Appeals Board process. How can workers report unsafe conditions at a construction firm penalized for safety violations? Workers can confidentially report hazards to Cal/OSHA district offices, regardless of immigration status, to protect workplace safety. Stay informed on workplace safety enforcement and fraud investigations. Subscribe to JacobiJournal.com for ongoing updates on Cal/OSHA penalties, legal cases, and compliance news. 🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com: