September 3, 2025 | JacobiJournal.com — A California appellate court has rejected efforts by two former co-counsel of disgraced attorney Tom Girardi to revive lawsuits alleging financial elder abuse and aiding in a breach of fiduciary duty. The ruling underscores the legal fallout that continues to unfold in connection with Girardi’s collapsed law empire and ongoing misconduct investigations.
Court Says Claims Cannot Be Revived
The co-attorneys had argued that Girardi and others were responsible for mismanaging settlement funds, including those owed to elderly clients. They sought to bring claims of elder abuse and fiduciary breaches, but the appellate panel affirmed a trial court’s dismissal. Judges ruled that the plaintiffs failed to meet the legal thresholds required to proceed under California’s elder abuse statutes.
Girardi Legacy of Legal and Financial Turmoil
Once one of California’s most prominent trial lawyers, Girardi’s downfall has been marked by bankruptcy, federal indictments, and professional disgrace. Allegations that settlement funds were siphoned from vulnerable clients—including widows, orphans, and elderly victims—have fueled nationwide scrutiny. This case reflects how former partners and associates are also struggling to separate themselves from his tainted legacy.
Legal Experts Weigh In
Observers note that the ruling reinforces courts’ reluctance to expand elder abuse statutes to attorney disputes between former colleagues. Instead, fiduciary duty and malpractice claims are being confined to more traditional boundaries. The appellate court’s decision may set an important precedent in future claims tied to Girardi’s fallout.
For a deeper look into the ongoing Girardi cases and related court actions, readers can review the California Courts of Appeal opinions available on the California Courts official website.
FAQs: Girardi Co-Attorneys Appeal
What was the case about?
Two of Tom Girardi’s former co-counsel attempted to bring elder abuse and fiduciary duty claims, alleging financial harm tied to settlement mismanagement.
Why did the court reject the claims?
The appeals court upheld the dismissal, finding that the allegations did not meet California’s legal standards for elder abuse or aiding and abetting fiduciary breaches.
How does this relate to Girardi’s other cases?
This ruling is part of a larger web of civil suits and criminal cases linked to Girardi’s misconduct, which include bankruptcy proceedings and federal fraud charges.
What precedent does this set?
The case highlights limits on applying elder abuse statutes to attorney disputes, signaling that future claims will face high scrutiny.
Stay informed on the latest in legal accountability and financial crime by subscribing to JacobiJournal.com.
🔎 Read More from JacobiJournal.com:
- Pennsylvania Hospital Fraud Suits Blocked by $19M Deal, Court Rules
- Allstate Targets $125K Fraud Scheme with RICO Lawsuit
- Appeals Court Revives Insurance Bad Faith Case in $7.5M Verdict
- Canton Man Pleads Guilty in $4M Medicare DME Fraud Scheme
- DOJ Seeks $11M in Civil Forfeiture Over Miami DME Fraud Case